Re: Text Entry [Re: direct text input for UML-message]
From: Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>
To: dia-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Text Entry [Re: direct text input for UML-message]
Date: 10 Feb 2003 20:28:31 -0600
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, James K. Lowden wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2003 16:21:03 -0600, Lars Clausen <lrclause@cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Alan Horkan wrote:
>> >
>> > If you use TAB to move between fields then you cannot put tabs in your
>> > text boxes.
>>
>> True, unless we add some escape sequence. But how often do you need to
>> put a tab in a text box? They don't really have a well-defined meaning
>> there. Tab is so commonly known as 'move to next input' that I think we
>> can make that the general behaviour.
>
> You can decide for yourself if it's a feature or not, but I've used
> applications that use TAB to 'move to next input' and ^I to insert a tab.
That sounds like a good compromise (if ^I doesn't register as a tab).
> It's a little hard to remember sometimes that TAB leaves the textbox, but
> not nearly so annoying as the alternative: *failing* to leave the textbox
> and accidentally altering its text.
Exactly.
> Tabs are somewhat useful in textboxes whose contents are somewhat
> structured.
Somewhat. Such structure really should be done with something slightly
spreadsheet-like.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?