On lun, 2002-08-26 at 20:44, Tim Ellis wrote: > > Personally I'd > > suggest that if PDF output were to be added, that dia put it > > through ps2pdf or something instead of doing it itself. Mind > > you, I've never found any PS to PDF converter entirely > > satisfactory. > > I guess I've found ImageMagick to be less than entirely satisfactory, too, > but it does a pretty good job. Only two issues I have: [...] > If Dia were to attempt to incorporate an output-as-PDF function, looking > at the ImageMagick "convert" command might be a good place to start. AFAIK, the ImageMagick support for PDF, PS and EPS is done thru GhostScript. So why using ImageMagick convert instead of ps2pdf which is a GhostScript utility ? Hub -- Job-less AbiWord hacker. - http://www.teaser.fr/~hfiguiere/ Cell phone: +33 6 18 01 42 11 GPG fingerprint: 6C44 DB3E 0BF3 EAF5 B433 239A 5FEE 05E6 A56E 15A3
This is a digitally signed message part