On 27 Nov 2003, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
>
>> I see the fault in the fact that we don't have rotation and flipping as
>> a general thing for all shapes. It's not something the shape itself
>> really should have to worry about, it's something that should be at
>> toolbox level. I'm thinking by now that the best way is to have a
>> rotate/flip/scale mode that is separate from the 'normal' modify mode.
>> I don't think some in-diagram handles for rotation would work well, the
>> objects would just be overloaded with handles.
>
> Agreed. And most of it ultimately stems from the Core X font handling.
> Keith P. and friends are now addressing that.
Actually, it hasn't been the fonts for a while now. Sure, they'd look
funny rotated, but I've had text rotation code lying around for a while.
It's internals (how to best represent rotations, eps. given things like
rotated groups), and externals, how to make a good GUI for it.
> By the way another nice thing everybody but X has, and Cairo will give
> us, is an alpha channel. Yes, Venn diagrams.
I will look forward to that, but I wouldn't want to tie Dia to it for a while.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| HĂ„rdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?