Subject: Re: once more with feeling (now going dotty)
Date: 06 Jan 2003 07:08:11 -0600
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Aaron Trevena wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 dia-list-request@gnome.org wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oops?
>> I've been thinking about an import filter for dot files -- it would
>> allow some final adjustments of dot-generated graphs. THere is an
>> option in dot to have it output its own format, but with layout
>> coordinates as annotations. Being able to read those would be nice.
>
> Golly! coords would be *so* cool - I will have to do a load more work
> with graphviz so I can really make the most of it. I will probably start
> off by allowing a dot format output and automagically using the right
> file format from the filename.
lrclause@shasta:.../dia:) dot -Tdot
digraph Foo { "Foo" -> "Bar" }
digraph Foo {
node [label="\N"];
graph [bb="0,0,54,124"];
Foo [pos="27,98", width="0.75", height="0.50"];
Bar [pos="27,26", width="0.75", height="0.50"];
Foo -> Bar [pos="e,27,44 27,80 27,72 27,63 27,54"];
}
Should be easy to parse.
> obDia :
>
> how useful / possible would a code to FSD or even FSD to code tool
> be. UML is *so* passe ;) State Diagrams rock, I haven't really done many
> since uni but I think I could parse out some clues from perl code and
> possibly c++ - anybody else got any ideas.
What kinds of FSD's are you talking about? Are these things close to
standardized? Can you give examples?
> finally anybody interested in a chart/graph/related tools website and
> mailing list - maybe something like use.perl.org ?
I'm sure there's some out there already, but I'm too lazy to go look.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?