On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Levi Bard wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2002 18:47:06 -0500
> Lars Clausen <lrclause@cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> The current CVS has some nasty problems with fonts. In particular,
>> fonts font interactively may be missing when printing. This is because
>> we use Freetype to print (and export to PNG), but X fonts to render.
>> While the two systems find mostly the same fonts, the names are
>> different (perry <> perrygothic, comics <> comicscartoon etc). Thus,
>> when trying to print with perrygothic, Freetype fails to find it and
>> picks a placeholder. Not pretty.
>>
>> This can all be solved by always using Freetype for rendering. However,
>> the Win32 version does its own Window-specific printing, and thus so far
>> hasn't required Freetype (and would rather not). I can't test the Win32
>> version at the moment, can anybody tell me if the displayed and printed
>> fonts are in sync?
>
> The displayed and printed fonts are not quite in sync on win32, but I'm
> not sure whether the resulting printout is enough different from the
> display to warrant any kind of major changes. The differences I had on
> UML models for a small c++ project were almost unnoticeable.
Yeah, there will always be some small changes due to hinting at different
scales. It could be eliminated by rendering in a fixed DPI and then
scaling, but that would make it look uglier on the screen. I'm considering
a user option to switch between the two.
Could you tell me what names those fonts I mentioned have under Windows,
and if possible, what names they have when using GDK_USE_XFT? The names
should be visible in the font selector.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?