On Thu, 24 May 2001, James Henstridge wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
>
> > Despite being named "portable", PNG is not as well supported for many
> > readers/viewers as is jpeg. Jpeg quality is also not necessarily worse,
> > it has a controllable "lossy" compression, which can be turned off
>
> Maybe JPEG 2000 supports lossless compression (bug is supported by even
> less programs than PNG), but the normal JPEGs are always lossless (quality
That should read lossy above ^^^^^^^^^^
James.