Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?

Lewis McCarthy (lmccarth@cs.umass.edu)
Mon, 08 Feb 1999 14:49:11 -0500

• Next message: Paulo Barreto: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"
• Previous message: Ben Laurie: "Possible Security Problem: Fake PGP Key"
• In reply to: Mail System Internal Data: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA"
• Next in thread: Rodney Thayer: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"
• Reply: Rodney Thayer: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"

James Donald writes:
> ECDSS should be OK, since those innumerable folk who claim patents against
> DSS are not suing, merely threatening and blustering, despite the fact that
> everyone is ignoring them.

The IEEE P1363 Patent Issues page may be a useful reference for those
trying to sort out the mess. Several of the patent coverage letters
from holders/claimants to the IEEE WG are available online:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/patents.html

-Lewis

-- 
"we have to yet really seriously debate the constitutional issues and 
whether or not we're willing to give up more freedom in order to have 
more security" -- U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen, 3 Feb 1999

• Next message: Paulo Barreto: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"
• Previous message: Ben Laurie: "Possible Security Problem: Fake PGP Key"
• In reply to: Mail System Internal Data: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA"
• Next in thread: Rodney Thayer: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"
• Reply: Rodney Thayer: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"