Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?

Rodney Thayer (rodney@tillerman.nu)
Mon, 08 Feb 1999 15:22:14 -0800

• Next message: Enzo Michelangeli: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"
• Previous message: Robert Hettinga: "[ZKS Press Release] Zero-Knowledge Systems Press Release"
• In reply to: Mail System Internal Data: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA"
• Next in thread: Anonymous: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"

The EC world has it's share of FUD generators on-line and operational.
There are also non-proprietary viewpoints, if you look.

At 02:49 PM 2/8/99 -0500, Lewis McCarthy wrote:
>James Donald writes:
>> ECDSS should be OK, since those innumerable folk who claim patents against
>> DSS are not suing, merely threatening and blustering, despite the fact that
>> everyone is ignoring them.
>
>The IEEE P1363 Patent Issues page may be a useful reference for those
>trying to sort out the mess. Several of the patent coverage letters
>from holders/claimants to the IEEE WG are available online:
>http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/patents.html
>
>-Lewis
>--
>"we have to yet really seriously debate the constitutional issues and
>whether or not we're willing to give up more freedom in order to have
>more security" -- U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen, 3 Feb 1999

• Next message: Enzo Michelangeli: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"
• Previous message: Robert Hettinga: "[ZKS Press Release] Zero-Knowledge Systems Press Release"
• In reply to: Mail System Internal Data: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA"
• Next in thread: Anonymous: "Re: Chaumian blinding in ECC and ElGamal?"