Re: Rubber Key Cryptography

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Julian Assange (proff@iq.org)
14 Dec 1998 07:43:10 +1100


Andrew Brown <acb@dial.pipex.com> writes:

> I suppose the real question is whether an organisation like Amnesty might
> judge that too widespread or public a use of encryption might perversely
> encourage the use of rubber key cryptography. But that's a quesiton for
                       ^^^^^^^^^^
> them, and possibly not one they would want to answer publicly.

Your mistake is awe-inspiring. I have been but a fool all this time.

The defence against `rubberhose cryptography' (or rather, `rubberhose
cryptanalysis') is not `deniable cryptography', but rather `rubber key
cryptography'. The poetry of symmetry. The thesis is the anti-thesis.

Keys,
Bits Flexible like rubber,
Lack commitment.

Cheers,
Julian.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:17:37