Bill Frantz (frantz@netcom.com)
Thu, 19 Nov 1998 21:15:48 -0700
At 1:07 PM -0700 11/19/98, James Nerlinger, Jr. wrote:
>I realize there is a good sized desire to allow anonymous access but is
>there really so great a posting group of anon addresses? I've been on the
>list for quite a while (I tend to simply lurk and listen) and the vast
>majority of posts are not anon.
I have gotten several very interesting insights from some of the anonymous
posters. It's an issue of quality vs. quantity. Even if less than 10% of
the posts are anonymous, those ones are still a significant contribution.
>
>Additionally, if you are considering a moderated list of any kind why not
>simply have users wishing to maintain their anonymity send their mail
>through you or via a single anon account that is subbed? It would ease the
>admin load and still allow anon posts a means of gaining post on the list.
A single exit remailer as last in the chain would be acceptable.
Redundancy cries for more than one however. Going thru a person who is
responsible for scrubbing the return address exposes that person to too
much legal pressure to reveal the identity of the poster.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Macintosh: Didn't do every-| Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | thing right, but did know | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | the century would end. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:17:18