Steve Salkin (salkin@mindspring.com)
Thu, 23 Jul 1998 03:25:15 -0400
At 12:02 AM 7/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
[ snip]
>Your question is very vague to begin with. I don't believe there is a on
>point ruling on "exporting expertise," which is what your question appears
>to deal with. Of course, I can be sure because I have no idea what you are
>asking here exactly and what the answer really might have said but it looks
>rather twisted to me.
>
>Now, does this belong on CodherPlunks?
>
>You didn't pay me. This isn't legal advice.
Well, my actual question was perhaps more specific, and appeared on this
list yesterday. The people who chose to respond tended to speak to the
general case, rather then my specific situation.
As far as your "expatriating clients", they may well be able to follow this
avenue. I am summarizing the content of answers received on the list and in
private email, a common practice designed to keep bandwidth consumption
down. I am not a lawyer and if I knew the answers to these questions I
would not have asked them. So save the sarcasm for someone who claims to
know the answer, OK? Any one of the replies which appeared before this
summary should do nicely.
Does it belong on CodherPlunks? Well, at least it was about the consequences
of implementing cryptosystems. Since this was the only complaint so far,
and since the thread was over until you posted it, I'll assume that the
harm, if any, did not outweigh the good.
Steve
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:51 ADT