Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Tue, 21 Jul 1998 11:42:55 -0400
Mok-Kong Shen writes:
> Xcott Craver wrote:
>
> > And it's pushing it to declare a cryptosystem "DED,"
> > when simply encrypting multiple times still yields a
> > secure (and efficient) cipher.
>
> If it is economically and otherwise justifiable, I also can see
> no reason why the 3 in 3DES can't be replaced by n.
Replacing it with an even number is a bad idea.
.pm
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:45 ADT