Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de)
Tue, 21 Jul 1998 12:38:01 +0100
Xcott Craver wrote:
> And it's pushing it to declare a cryptosystem "DED,"
> when simply encrypting multiple times still yields a
> secure (and efficient) cipher.
If it is economically and otherwise justifiable, I also can see
no reason why the 3 in 3DES can't be replaced by n. One can certainly
also combine DES with other encryption algorithms.
M. K. Shen
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:43 ADT