Re: self-executing "language"?

Paul H. Merrill (paulmerrill@acm.org)
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:41:23 -0700

• Next message: Ian Clysdale: "RE: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• Previous message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• In reply to: Anonymous: "Re: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• Next in thread: Ray Arachelian: "Re: self-executing "language"?"

Even with an interpretive language the source code is just the "recipe"
for the interpreter to follow, not the actual controller of the
hardware.

PHM

Ray Arachelian wrote:
>
> You know, there are C interpreters out there... I recall a book called
> "The Art of C" or its companion having a C interpreter.
>
> > I, personally, would love to see ANY C code execute on ANYTHING
> > without being compiled.
>
> --
>
> =====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
> .+.^.+.| Ray Arachelian |Prying open my 3rd eye. So good to see |./|\.
> ..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were |/\|/\
> <--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run |\/|\/
> ../|\..| "A toast to Odin, |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/.
> .+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were.... |.....
> ======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================

• Next message: Ian Clysdale: "RE: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• Previous message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• In reply to: Anonymous: "Re: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• Next in thread: Ray Arachelian: "Re: self-executing "language"?"