Re: linux kernel loopback encryption

Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:29:36 -0400

• Next message: Paul H. Merrill: "Re: self-executing "language"?"
• Previous message: Anonymous: "Re: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• In reply to: Bruce Schneier: "Re: linux kernel loopkack encryption"
• Next in thread: Bruce Schneier: "CAST"
• Reply: Bruce Schneier: "CAST"

Anonymous writes:
> OK...just saying that, if anyone feels a need to use Twofish at this
> point, combine it with something old; CAST just happened to be the first
> moderately old cipher that popped to mind.

CAST can't even be three years old.

Perry

• Next message: Paul H. Merrill: "Re: self-executing "language"?"
• Previous message: Anonymous: "Re: linux kernel loopback encryption"
• In reply to: Bruce Schneier: "Re: linux kernel loopkack encryption"
• Next in thread: Bruce Schneier: "CAST"
• Reply: Bruce Schneier: "CAST"