Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:14:48 -0400


> > Do you know the distributions restrictions on SAFER? If I do manage to
> > get the whole thing working, I'd like the patches to be usable by the
> > Linux kernel team.. which would mean that commercial use is fine.
>
> You can try TEA (http://vader.brad.ac.uk/tea/tea.shtml). It's simple and
> fast.

It has also been broken, hasn't it?

SAFER doesn't strike me as a good idea, but TEA *really* doesn't
strike me as a good idea.

> Anybody knows about TEA cryptoanalisys (I already read the paper about
> modified TEA)?. It´s safe enough?. I'm developing a distributed DB for
> ESNET (a spanish IRC network) and it uses TEA for nick registration and
> database integrity check.

If you aren't pushing huge amounts of data, why not just stick to 3DES
or something similar?

Perry


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:18:57 ADT