Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jesús Cea Avión (jcea@argo.es)
Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:56:26 +0000


[TEA]
> It has also been broken, hasn't it?

Eh?. I haven´t seen anything about that. Only the more "strong" version
in the same home site.

The search "tea and cryptoana*" in Altavista gives 7 matches, not
related.

Do you have any reference?.

> SAFER doesn't strike me as a good idea, but TEA *really* doesn't
> strike me as a good idea.

Why not?. I need a *simple*, *lightning* fast crypt, without setup
overhead. Streng is important but only for "domestic" attacks, since
each register is crypted using its unique "user provided but server
generated" key. In fact we are using only 64 bit keys, with up-most 64
bits set to 0. The users already have a hard time remembering 12 random
chars (64 bits coded as two 32 bit base64).

> If you aren't pushing huge amounts of data, why not just stick to 3DES
> or something similar?

Speed and simplicity.

-- 
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea@argo.es http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
                                      _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
PGP Key Available at KeyServ   _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibnitz


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:18:58 ADT