Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur"

Adam Shostack (adam@homeport.org)
Tue, 19 May 1998 08:04:35 -0400 (EDT)

• Next message: Martin G. Diehl: "Re: Another Test on RSA Keys"
• Previous message: Werner Koch: "Re: newbie crypto/coding query"
• In reply to: Nicholas Charles Brawn: "newbie crypto/coding query"
• Next in thread: Peter Gutmann: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""

Loren J. Rittle wrote:

| Good grief! With how cheap RAM is these days, why is anyone still
| configuring a secure system with swap-to-disk enabled?

Didn't you mean to say 'With how cheap linux is these days, why is
anyone still configuring a system that needs to be secure with
Win95?'

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume

• Next message: Martin G. Diehl: "Re: Another Test on RSA Keys"
• Previous message: Werner Koch: "Re: newbie crypto/coding query"
• In reply to: Nicholas Charles Brawn: "newbie crypto/coding query"
• Next in thread: Peter Gutmann: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""