To: "discussions about usage and development of dia" <dia-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: UML-Conformity
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:00:07 +0200 (CEST)
> discussions about usage and development of dia <dia-list gnome org>
> schrieb am 19.06.04 04:50:15:
>
> I'd like to take part in this and develop some solutions (already coded
> some UML-Tools, esp. sequence diagrams) but I took a look at the lines of
> code, the object structure and missed some of the easy Java object
> strategy. Quite hard to understand 2.000 lines of arrow-producing C-code
> when you're used to 200 line abstract class modelling *g*. But I'll try
> it.
The object structure isn't easy, but you wouldn't need to deal much with
that for hacking label placements. There's a patch come in that I'll
apply shortly that should help, too.
> Why are there no fancy diagrams of dia itself drawn with dia?
I for one don't use UML much, I'm into Dia for the more informal diagrams,
to be used in articles.
-Lars