From: "Dolores Alia de Saravia" <loli unsa edu ar>
To: dia-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Help to compile 0.91-prex
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:02:25 -0300
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 Lars Clausen wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote:
> >
> > On Fru, 21 Feb 2003, Lars Clausen wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote:
> >> > I'am trying to compile dia 0.91 (I began 5 days ago because of
> >> > vacations).
> >
> >> > But right now, I would like to understand better the
differences
> >> > between some "words" appearing in dia.spec and INSTALL files
> >> > Requires
> >>
> >> This lists the packages necessary to run the compiled code.
Things
> > like
> >> libgtk2 etc.
> >>
> >> > BuildRequires
> >>
> >> This lists the packages necessary to compile the code. On top of
the
> >> development versions of the above, it also includes some
compilation
> > tools
> >> like automake, autoconf and libtool.
> >>
> > So, if I'm trying to install Pango, Pango-1.1.6, from the tar.gz
> > file,
> > will I need, first, to install the BuildRequired packages?
> > I have found several of them but I have not benn able to find
the
> > "xxxxx-devel" ones
>
> They should all be in
>
>
http://www.suse.de/us/private/download/gnomes/i386/update_for_8_0/devel
.html
>
I have visited that place but some of version numbers are not good. I
will continue looking..
> Or you can get the tarballs from ftp.gnome.org. I guess I'll have
to make
I think I got pango 1.1.6 from ftp.gnome.org; now I realize that it
says there it is an unstable version.
Pregunta importante:
en ftp.gnome.org/pub/gtk/v2.0 aparecen
gtk+2.0.9
y pango 1.0.5
it seems that gtk+2.0.9 does not need pango >=1.1.5
what about dia?
Thanks again
Loli
email: loli@unsa.edu.ar
Sent using NeoMail, a web-based e-mail client.
http://neomail.sourceforge.net