On 19 Feb 2003, pvspam-dialist@hacklab.net wrote:
>> What we're really talking about, I think, is what two names to use for
>> these three things:
>>
>> 1. a zipped dia file
>> 2. an unzipped dia file
>> 3. a dia file
>
> Unless of course you've split the world into only the first two cases.
> It's a matter of how you personally have set up the taxonomy of file
> types. If you have broken the universe of Dia files into type 1 and 2,
> then ".gzdia" and ".dia" suffice.
How about
+----------+
| dia file |
+----------+
|
/ \
+------------------------+
| |
+------------+ +--------------+
| zipped dia | | unzipped dia |
+------------+ +--------------+
Darn, where did my ASCII export go?
> Sometimes I really do want to edit the .dia file in a text editor.
> Really. You might not believe it, but use it to make a database schema
> with 30 classes, and you'll start to want to edit the .dia file in a
> text editor, too. Just one simple case: I want to change every blue
> class to a green one. Or, I want these 8 classes to all be the exact
> same shade of purple.
That's why I want to make even more fancy selection methods: Select by
property would be obviously useful. But we need the changing of multiple
objects to work way better first.
> When you are faced with eight .dia files, and you wonder which are
> gzipped (and thus need preprocessing before editing) it would be far
> less tedious if there were *SOME* indication of which were zipped and
> which weren't.
Or you could use an editor that automatically detects it and unzips/rezips
for you.
> And why do I reckon BeOS had this down pat?
Because BeOS did everything right the first time:) Just like NeXT.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| HĂ„rdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?