> > Sorry for the incovenience. The M$ compiler docs claim this construct to
> > be correct (there is no warning at all for the redefinition and at least
> > for C++ this is standard conform :) See :
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclang98/ht
> > ml/_pluslang_redeclaration_of_typedef_names.asp
> For ANSI C, declarator identifiers have to be unique (see K&R 2.ed p216 and
> 219). So it's a no-no.
Incidentally, why are we referring to the Microsoft compiler docs as evidence of the standard?