Re: petal2dia?

[James Michael DuPont <mdupont777 yahoo com>]

--- Levi Bard <levi@bard.sytes.net> wrote:
> Mmm, at first glance (knee jerk), this seems like it has the
> potential for being much easier to implement than XMI support. 

> Though, I agree, XMI still would be cool, the main reason for wanting
> it at this point is to swap with Rose.  

The point is that if we can get the gjc running, we can have support of
xmi and of petal. The guys in argouml have lots of nice java
components, just waited to be cherrypicked..

mike

=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus – Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com