Re: function to resize a UML class object's extent?

["Andrew S . Halper" <ashalper acm org>]

On 2001.11.29 23:07 Cyrille Chepelov wrote:

> Given that UMLClass is not 100% Stdprop (it's more like...1% ;-) ), I think
> this call to umlclass_calculate_data should go just before calling
> umlclass_update_data. Or, if this has no measurable adverse effects on
> performance, just at the beginning of umlclass_update_data() (this is
> howitzer-debugging, but with a comment just after the call, this shouldn't
> be too bad an interim solution)

And not part of that 1% is UML class attributes?

(stubby line 119 of objects/UML/class.c):

  /* Attributes: XXX */

:(

Thanks,
Andy