Re: [RFC] moving translations off sheets ?

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:

> In short, the plan could be the following:
> 
> 	- ASAP: 0.89-rc1 (from the current CVS) 
> 	- ASAP+few days: 0.89 proper (everything's perfect, isn't it ?)
> 	- for 0.90: string handling audit ; xml-i18n-tools ; actual removal
> 	of renderobjects and libsybase.so ; if we're bold, flipping the
> 	UNICODE_WORK_IN_PROGRESS switch.
> 	- after 0.90: removing the UNICODE_WIP symbol (making its code the
> 	default) [*]
> 
> (of course, I haven't talked about the GUI area or Bonobo stuff, which
> while important, isn't much into my area of knowledge)
> 
> Lower priority but important too: kill lazyprops (no fun job, but I feel
> it's my mess -- I welcome help, of course !), bring objects into
> modernity (and in the mean time, have at least a Connection and an
> Element polished and tagged as "reference objects" for new object
> writers).
> 
> [*] that doesn't mean UNICODE mandatory. This is a separate issue.
> 	
> What do you think of this ?

I would add one thing, most likely to 0.90, namely optional use of the
freetype library.  While there are other areas where I have "wouldn't it be
neat" ideas, fonts is a "this currently sucks" area.  Though it is very
quiet about it, FreeType does seem to handle UniCode fonts.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause) | Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I    | Retainer of Sir Kegg
will defend to the death your right to say it."    |   of Westfield
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire   | Chaos Berserker of Khorne