Re: Vernam Cipher

Alex Alten (Alten@home.com)
Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:19:32 -0700

• Next message: mgraffam@idsi.net: "/dev/random analysis on Linux/x86"
• Previous message: mgraffam@idsi.net: "Re: Analysis of /dev/random"
• In reply to: Adam Shostack: "Re: Analysis of /dev/random"

At this point I think that any reasonable person on this list
would accept Menezes et al., definition of a Vernam cipher.

This is exactly what I mean when I use the term. This is how we
understand and use it at TriStrata. I sincerely hope that those
who disagreed with this definition will accept it and use it
properly in any further discussions on this list.

Thank you Mr. Shen for your very thoughtful contribution.

- Alex

--
Alex Alten
Alten@Home.Com
Alten@TriStrata.Com
P.O. Box 11406
Pleasanton, CA  94588  USA
(925) 417-0159

• Next message: mgraffam@idsi.net: "/dev/random analysis on Linux/x86"
• Previous message: mgraffam@idsi.net: "Re: Analysis of /dev/random"
• In reply to: Adam Shostack: "Re: Analysis of /dev/random"