Re: Analysis of /dev/random

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jim Gillogly (jim@acm.org)
Thu, 08 Apr 1999 17:17:46 -0700


David Honig writes:
> I just generated some raw binary files with my BSD 3.0 (Walnut Creek)
> /dev/random and then ran Maurer's Universal Statistical Test (blocksize=8
> bits)
> on the result. MUST measured ~7.19 reliably on several indendent runs. This
> is the expected value for a uniformly distributed random sample.
>
> BSD's /dev/random is good.

However (testing on Linux 2.2.0), /dev/urandom also gives ~7.19 over several
runs. I also tested random(3) by printing out 8 bits of subsequent calls
and running them through MUST, and they were also indistinguishable from
/dev/urandom.

Looks good, but MUST can't test everything.

-- 
	Jim Gillogly
	Trewesday, 18 Astron S.R. 1999, 00:14
	12.19.6.1.12, 1 Eb 5 Uayeb, Fifth Lord of Night


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Thu May 27 1999 - 23:44:21