Re: OK...

Alex Alten (Alten@home.com)
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:10:47 -0500

• Next message: Enzo Michelangeli: "Re: ssl proxy, non-browser client"
• Previous message: James A. Donald: "RE: Anonymous cash via blinded authentication"
• In reply to: Anonymous: "RE: Anonymous cash via blinded authentication"

At 10:03 AM 3/14/99 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
>
>I have done it both ways, and would never attempt the VB
>compliant wrapper functions any more.
>
>I know another guy who has done it both ways, and he reached
>the same conclusion.
>

I'm not a VB programmer. Maybe you could explain why COM is
superior to a DLL wrapper. Is there something about it, say
ease of use, that overrides the extra complexity and overhead
that is incurred with it? Could you explain this in more
technical detail?

- Alex

--
Alex Alten
Alten@Home.Com
Alten@TriStrata.Com
P.O. Box 11406
Pleasanton, CA  94588  USA
(925) 417-0159

• Next message: Enzo Michelangeli: "Re: ssl proxy, non-browser client"
• Previous message: James A. Donald: "RE: Anonymous cash via blinded authentication"
• In reply to: Anonymous: "RE: Anonymous cash via blinded authentication"