Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
03 Mar 1999 12:24:26 -0500
I must be missing something -- why is this appropriate on EITHER
mailing list it is being sent to?
David Hayes <david.hayes@mci.com> writes:
> At 06:07 AM 3/2/99 -0800, bram wrote:
> >On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Bill Stewart wrote:
> >(Thinking he should get a domain in .to - that WIPO DNS paper looked kinda
> >scary)
>
> I must have missed a bit of this. Why is ".to" any different from what WIPO
> proposes to do to the rest of DNS?
>
> --
> David Hayes David.Hayes@MCI.Com
> Switch Systems Planning & Engineering voice: 972-729-7236
> MCI Worldcom, Inc. VNET: 777-7236
> --If these thoughts were MCI's official opinions, the line above would
> --read "MCI - Law & Public Policy Department".
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:49