Re: SSL sans RSA

James A. Donald (jamesd@echeque.com)
Sat, 20 Feb 1999 17:42:40 -0800

• Next message: James A. Donald: "Re: reflecting on RC4"
• Previous message: Lewis McCarthy: "Re: optimality of grover's algorithm as proof P != NP"
• Next in thread: EKR: "Re: SSL sans RSA"
• Reply: EKR: "Re: SSL sans RSA"
• Reply: Michael F. Reusch: "Re: SSL sans RSA"
• Reply: Bill Frantz: "Re: SSL sans RSA"

    --
At 04:17 PM 2/17/99 +0100, Martin Grap wrote:
> Have a look at RFC 2459 (Internet X.509 Public Key
> Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile). The document
> describes object-Id's and other ASN.1 stuff for algorithms
> different from RSA when used in X.509 cetificates.

Warning: I have heard numerous complaints that ASN.1 sucks
mightily--not that I understand the complaints or am
competent to judge them.

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     KxXuPL/+VMDD46iJi1uXimP6XXeg5F3LbOUtRBp3
     4bNEfA18TcI/xwy1/ELu9Aw+tBUKhxHRssLYVpGnr
-----------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.

http://www.jim.com/jamesd/      James A. Donald

• Next message: James A. Donald: "Re: reflecting on RC4"
• Previous message: Lewis McCarthy: "Re: optimality of grover's algorithm as proof P != NP"
• Next in thread: EKR: "Re: SSL sans RSA"
• Reply: EKR: "Re: SSL sans RSA"
• Reply: Michael F. Reusch: "Re: SSL sans RSA"
• Reply: Bill Frantz: "Re: SSL sans RSA"