Re: Selecting parameters for LCGs

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Bill Frantz (frantz@netcom.com)
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 23:18:16 -0700


At 4:16 PM -0700 2/3/99, bram wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Jim Gillogly wrote:
>
>> bram writes:
>> >
>> > One of the advantages of a strict PRNG is that you can make it spit out
>> > the exact same output multiple times. Applications where that is
>> > beneficial (for example, simulations which have no security needs) can
>> > actually be hurt by using a CSPRNG.
>>
>> Did I use the terminology wrong? By CSPRNG I meant "cryptographic
>> strength PSEUDO random number generator"
>
>Oh, I meant Continuously Seeded Pseudo Random Number Generator - a
>distinct cryptographic primitive.
>
>Someone posted here that he uses CSPRNG to refer to random number
>generators which you can feed entropy bits into at any time, so I started
>doing that as well. Do people think this is reasonably clear? The paper on
>counterpane proposes calling them PRNG's, but to me that already has a
>specific meaning - something which gets seeded once and from there on
>spits out apparently random but deterministically generated bits.

I thought I had coined the phrase, but I seem to remember seeing it used in
Applied Cryptography (version 2), so I guess it is Schneier's. My copy is
at work, so I can't chase down the reference.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Macintosh: Didn't do every-| Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | thing right, but did know | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | the century would end. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:26