Re: Chaffing and Winnowing

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jim Gillogly (jim@acm.org)
Wed, 03 Feb 1999 12:17:41 -0800


Anonymous writes:
> Very interesting idea!
>
> Would the same thing work for RSA encryption without any symmetric keys?
> Send N-k bits of the transformed message in the clear, and the remaining
> k bits RSA encrypted.

Yes, that should work fine. Just make sure k >= 128 (or whatever level
of protection is desired) and use appropriate padding. If the all-or-nothing
transform is fast enough (and secure, of course), it should be a lot faster
than doing RSA on the whole thing. Let's patent it: "Gillogly & Anonymous
1999"... just in time for the RSA going-away party. Shall we cut Ron in for
a piece of the action? :)

-- 
	Jim Gillogly
	13 Solmath S.R. 1999, 20:12
	12.19.5.16.8, 2 Lamat 1 Pax, Fourth Lord of Night


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:25