Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de)
Mon, 01 Feb 1999 15:43:26 +0100
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> mok-kong shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de> writes:
> > How secure is then the (ordinary) messages encrypted with a session
> > key (with whatever method you employ) with respect to the same
> > type of attack? As I said, since the volume encrypted by the master
>
> Mr. Shen, why are you bothering us with this stupidity?
>
> If one needs a session key, there is a simple way to do it. You crank
> your RNG once and you get a session key. Big deal. Why are you wasting
> our time on this immense discussion of an absolutely worthless method?
>
> Oh, pardon, its because "you are learning" and "scientists discuss
> things, even stupid things!" or some such drivel.
I said in another thread, you need neither be annoyed nor cranked
or otherwise be discomforted. Just use a few mouse movements
to skip my messages. I wonder why you looked again at my recent posts
in the first place after our exchange of posts previously.
M. K. Shen
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:25