Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:25
Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de)
Mon, 01 Feb 1999 14:47:52 +0100
Jim Gillogly wrote:
>
>
> M-K Shen wrote:
> > Brad Kemp wrote:
> >>
> >> If there is any data loss (i.e. lost packet or corrupted disk) the
> >> rest of the plaintext is lost.
> >
> > I have addressed this point in a response to Jim Gillogly. If
> > communication line is functioning, their protocol should take care
> > of lost packets and retrasnsmission. Certainly my scheme does not
> > address hardware problems on the side of communication partners. But
> > that is also not addressed by other schemes, if I don't err.
>
> Taking these in reverse order: You do. It is. True enough. Not
> relevant to your session key scheme. Not adequately.
>
> 'Nuff said... on this end, anyway.
>
I don't understand. The above was addressed to Brad Kemp. It is
certainly o.k. that you answered in his place. But your answer does
not appear to have 'substance' and I don't yet see your answer
to the other of my response that was addressed to you. BTW, my
English is unfortunately not so good as to comprehend your last
sentence well. Perhaps you would be kind engough to employ simpler
plain English for correspondce to a foreigner.
M. K. Shen
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:25