Jim Gillogly (jim@acm.org)
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:58:42 -0800
M-K Shen writes:
> Now Gillogly first criticized my terminology.
> I tried to agrue for keeping the old name. But this is quite common
> in scientific arguments. If Gillogly had written back, pointing
> out more clearly that the argument I made is wrong, I would have
> sooner done the renaming. But he didn't wrote.
Now just a cotton-pickin' minute. I'm not responsible for engaging
you or anyone else in extended arguments and discussions. You posted
to CodherPlunks on 8 Jan, and I replied the same day with what I thought
were cogent arguments about why the name you chose was misleading and
counterproductive. Others followed and nobody agreed with you. The
fact that I was the first in this forum to call your attention to the
problem does not obligate me to argue it at length with you.
I seldom read sci.crypt these days, but within a few days of your 8
Jan message I visited there again to find the same debate raging, and
that you had already gotten plenty of feedback on your choice of names.
Leave me out of your blame game!
-- Jim Gillogly 22 Afteryule S.R. 1999, 19:52 12.19.5.15.7, 7 Manik 20 Kankin, First Lord of Night
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:03