Re: No vulnerability known in SSH-1.2.26

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Anonymous (nobody@replay.com)
Tue, 3 Nov 1998 00:47:24 +0100


Tatu Ylonen wrote:
> We are also trying to track down the linux compilation problem that
> may have caused the false alert behind the IBM advisory. We will
> issue an announcement as soon as possible if real vulnerability is
> found.

A second possibility, which I obviously can't judge as likely or unlikely
in this case, is that some binary has been intentionally compromised --
adversary gets access for a short time -> bad binaries...time
passes...buffer overflow exploited -> recompilation -> good binaries ->
world-famous disappearing exploit. If the binaries were downloaded, then
we have an entirely different issue to consider (binaries changed at a
source or, less likely, an actual MITM attack).

If you think it's worth checking, just compare hashes of those binaries
(or, if you're ultra-paranoid, actual binaries) which should be identical.

> Tatu Ylonen <ylo@ssh.fi>

(I won't be able to read replies on ssh)


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:17:17