Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?

jwashbur@whittman-hart.com
Mon, 24 Aug 1998 08:07:34 -0500

• Next message: Andy Brown: "What benefit would there be in using triple RC4-40?"
• Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"
• In reply to: steven.soroka@mts.mb.ca: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"
• Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"
• Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"

There is a great source. "The art of computer programming, Volume 2:
semi-numerical methods", by Donald E. Knuth.

If your Psuedo-Random Number Generator passes the 10 (and all 10) tests
described in chapter 2 (Random numbers) you have a PRNG with no known
flaws.

In Liberty,
John Washburn

• Next message: Andy Brown: "What benefit would there be in using triple RC4-40?"
• Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"
• In reply to: steven.soroka@mts.mb.ca: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"
• Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"
• Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Pseudo-random code in asm?"