Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Fri, 21 Aug 1998 19:51:59 -0400
Please don't send messages like this to CodherPlunks. They are
appropriate for Cryptography, however.
David Honig writes:
> At 01:32 PM 8/21/98 -0400, John R Levine wrote:
> >
> >I suppose this is the digital equivalent of wrapping your Cuban cigars in th
e
> >poopy diapers.
>
> Which ruins the cigars. The proper way to launder cigars is to exchange the
> Havana ring for some legit variety. However, customs reportedly (this is fro
m
> soc.cigar or whatever people from years ago) can detect Cubans by smell.
>
> Encrypted data is more obvious ---every *other* kind of data has structure.
> Just histogramming it will give 'signatures'.
>
> You don't have to be a chemist to detect explosives, you just need a dolt
> with the
> right machine. You don't have to understand entropy to measure it.
>
>
> Stego distributes suspicion over *all* of *everyone*'s multimedia data.
> (Analogous to: When you do anonymous IP tunneling, you should pick random
> source-addresses so as to distribute blame over the whole IP range.)
> This is much better than concentrating your precious bits in an obvious
> high-entropy file.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There is a secret message embedded in the phosphor of this period.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:11:00