Re: Crypto-sendmail (was Crypto Coding Project)

Adam Shostack (adam@weathership.homeport.org)
Wed, 19 Aug 1998 11:22:34 -0400

• Next message: Ng Pheng Siong: "Re: Crypto-sendmail (was Crypto Coding Project)"
• Previous message: Ng Pheng Siong: "Re: H_e_l_p W_a_n_t_e_d :-)"
• In reply to: David Honig: "Re: H_e_l_p W_a_n_t_e_d :-)"
• Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Crypto-sendmail (was Crypto Coding Project)"

On Wed, Aug 19, 1998 at 11:11:42PM +0800, Ng Pheng Siong wrote:
| On Aug 19, Adam Shostack wrote:
| > I ask because most of my machines today run qmail, and I hope will
| > soon run Vmailer.
|
| Are you saying Vmailer > qmail, or that you just want to give Vmailer
| a spin soon?

        I'm saying that I found the qmail source, with its lack of doc
& comments, to be unauditable with any reasonable amount of effort. I
don't like that.

        Please do not cross post this to qmail lists. Dan knows how I
feel. I know how Dan feels. The issue flamed up again after I posted
something to bugtraq about the auditability of qmail. I have no
desire to start that flamewar again. You can read it (thread: code
readability) wherever the qmail list is archived.

Adam

• Next message: Ng Pheng Siong: "Re: Crypto-sendmail (was Crypto Coding Project)"
• Previous message: Ng Pheng Siong: "Re: H_e_l_p W_a_n_t_e_d :-)"
• In reply to: David Honig: "Re: H_e_l_p W_a_n_t_e_d :-)"
• Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Crypto-sendmail (was Crypto Coding Project)"