Re: RC5/6 Patents - Clarifications

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

KDBriggs1@aol.com
Tue, 28 Jul 1998 11:08:44 EDT


vin@shore.net wrote:
>>>
Bruce Schneier summarized the situation in Applied
Cryptography II by saying, in effect, that the DSA is still clouded by
patent issues.
<<<

But Schneier also says this on p. 498 of AC2:

"All of the various discrete-logarithm-based digital signature schemes have
been put in one coherent framework. In my opinion this finally puts to rest
any patent dispute between Schnorr and DSA: DSA is not a derivative of
Schnorr, nor even of ElGamal. All three are examples of this general
construction, and this general construction is unpatented."

Kent


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:58 ADT