Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:09 ADT
Mike Rosing (eresrch@msn.fullfeed.com)
Tue, 7 Jul 1998 09:33:58 -0500 (CDT)
> Whatever your source, if your "random" data doesn't pass a good statistics
> test, it may still be useful as a source of "true random" data. You'll
> just have to do more post processing on it, to reduce the data rate and
> throw out the non-randomness. It might be good to do this anyways, just
> in case. If you ran a statistics test on the raw data at the same time
> you crunched it down, you could come up with "failing/failed" status
> bits along with the actual data.
Yup, I've got a statistics professor who's been working on me for the
past few years. That's what makes this project fun. And that's the
point you know, to have fun. If you want to make money, don't waste time
with radioactive sources. If you want to have fun and like building
electronics it's a hell of a neat project.
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:09 ADT