Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows

Chris Wedgwood (chris@cybernet.co.nz)
Sat, 20 Jun 1998 10:51:05 +1200

• Next message: Robert Hettinga: "Herpatological Liberation Front?"
• Previous message: Peter Gutmann: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"
• Maybe in reply to: Simon R Knight: "Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"
• Next in thread: Simon R Knight: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"

On Fri, Jun 19, 1998 at 10:01:23AM -0400, tony@secapl.com wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> Does this hold true in systems that have virtual memory disabled? (after
> putting enough physical memory in first, of course.) Does any paging
> happen then? I don't see any disk activity, but have not tested for
> patterns yet.

Presumably not.

I've had lots of problems running with a swap file though, lots of
applications barf because they can't find enough memory - when I have 256MB
installed (NT 4 SP3).

-Chris

• Next message: Robert Hettinga: "Herpatological Liberation Front?"
• Previous message: Peter Gutmann: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"
• Maybe in reply to: Simon R Knight: "Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"
• Next in thread: Simon R Knight: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"