Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur"

staym@accessdata.com
Thu, 14 May 1998 12:21:08 -0600

• Next message: William H. Geiger III: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""
• Previous message: bill.stewart@pobox.com: "Re: Chaffing and winnowing"
• In reply to: Mark Tillotson: "Re: Chaffing and winnowing"
• Next in thread: William H. Geiger III: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""
• Reply: William H. Geiger III: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""

SecurPC for Windows 95 Version 2.0.2
The system didn't have anything else running (it got written whenever
the password was changed); the sectors the passwords were in were
unallocated. Seems like it chose a random unallocated sector and
dropped it there.

It may be that his disk was infected with a sniffer.

-- 
Mike Stay
Cryptographer / Programmer
AccessData Corp.
mailto:staym@accessdata.com

• Next message: William H. Geiger III: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""
• Previous message: bill.stewart@pobox.com: "Re: Chaffing and winnowing"
• In reply to: Mark Tillotson: "Re: Chaffing and winnowing"
• Next in thread: William H. Geiger III: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""
• Reply: William H. Geiger III: "Re: RSA's SecurPC not-so-"Secur""