Re: ElGamal signature encoding

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Werner Koch (wk@isil.d.shuttle.de)
Tue, 7 Apr 1998 08:40:15 +0200


Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> writes:

> DSS signatures are considerably faster and smaller, and ElGamal
> signatures have a known weakness which requires keys to be carefully

This is not very complicated (and fast) if you use Lim and Lee suggested
method to generate the prime.

> At the IETF meeting last week, there was a rumor going around of a
> patent which would cover ElGamal signatures (but supposedly not DSS).

Hmmm, my initial decision to use ElGamal was due to the Schnorr and the
Kravitz patent on DSA.

-- 
Werner                      (finger gcrypt@ftp.guug.de for info about GnuPG)


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:16:54 ADT