Re: ElGamal signature encoding

Werner Koch (wk@isil.d.shuttle.de)
Mon, 6 Apr 1998 20:06:51 +0200

• Next message: Jim Gillogly: "Re: mercury rising query..."
• Previous message: Andreas Bogk: "Re: mercury rising query..."
• In reply to: Peter Wayner: "mercury rising query..."
• Next in thread: Lewis McCarthy: "Re: ElGamal signature encoding"

Lewis McCarthy <lmccarth@cs.umass.edu> writes:

> What did you mean by "this is the way PGP does it", if not block formatting

Sorry, I was talking about PGP 2.x with RSA and RFC1991.

> for ElGamal signatures. (You didn't mention any other signature scheme in
> your previous message.)

GNUPG does not support RSA due of patent conflicts (It is RSA ready, but
the actual code will not be published before Sep 20th, 2000 :-)

-- 
Werner                      (finger gcrypt@ftp.guug.de for info about GnuPG)

• Next message: Jim Gillogly: "Re: mercury rising query..."
• Previous message: Andreas Bogk: "Re: mercury rising query..."
• In reply to: Peter Wayner: "mercury rising query..."
• Next in thread: Lewis McCarthy: "Re: ElGamal signature encoding"