To: discussions about usage and development of dia <dia-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Prerelease of 0.94 is out
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:56:37 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Lars Clausen wrote:
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:24:53 +0200
> From: Lars Clausen <lars raeder dk>
> Reply-To: discussions about usage and development of dia
> <dia-list gnome org>
> To: discussions about usage and development of dia <dia-list gnome org>
> Subject: Re: Prerelease of 0.94 is out
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 11:43, Zhang Lin-bo wrote:
> > > would you expect 0.94 to work with a fairly stock setup of Fedora Core 2?
> > I have noticed some dependency issues with FC2, e.g.,
> > python-gtk should be changed to pygtk2, freetype2 and freetype2-devel
> > to freetype and freetype-devel, and popt-devel is included in popt
> > in FC2.
> But in another thread, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > Worked beautifully on Fedora Core 2.
> > It has been a long time since I've built Dia so easily.
> > Later I'll try some of the other build types if i can.
> So which will it be? Or is there a way to say one or the other? I
> believe there used to be a freetype package (freetype 1.*, not 2.*), and
> we definitely don't want that.
I'd expect we very deliberately moved to freetype 2 because of a bug.
I got a working GTK build which definately didn't have Python although I
suspect it probably should have. I cannot say I paid much attention to
any warnings (beyond the ones I already mentioned) because I got a working
build. I should all the -devel stuff installed on my system which might
have made a difference (i haphazardly tried to install just about
everything Gnome related).
Is it possible that although we both have "Fedora Core 2" we are not
running exactly the same thing? I burned CDs and installed it just a few
Are there any details you would like me to double check?
(My machine with Fedora Core on it is not connected to the internet,
checking details takes time).