[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: combined UML diagrams



On 28 Oct 2003, Lars Clausen wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2003, saintiss@gmx.net wrote:
>
>>> That sounds really strange, I'm sure people would have noticed by now
>>> -- and indeed, it doesn't do that for me.  Can you send me a diagram
>>> that behaves this way?
>>
>> Ok, I've attached one... However, I just noticed that the behaviour only
>> occurs if the classes are parented inside a package...
>
> Ah, yes, that I see.  Not good.

I can't believe nobody caught this before now.  The connections just
weren't saved nor loaded.  An easy fix, though it pointed out another nasty
bug (try drag-creating a UML Class inside a Large Package, but right at the
edge.  Boom!)  Guess another brown bag is needed.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| HĂ„rdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] Mail converted by Mofo Magic and the Flying D

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

GuideSMACK