From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden schemamania org>
To: dia-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Prefs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:08:36 -0500
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:45:45 -0600, Lars Clausen <lrclause@cs.uiuc.edu>
wrote:
> Externally defined -- the dialog is designed with Glade and somehow (I'm
> not sure how that'd be the easiest) connected with the prefs structure.
> Pro: More exact design possible. Con: Harder to maintain.
I'm going to posit a radical tastes-great-less-filling hypothesis: More
exact design possible and easier to maintain. :-)
I mean only that we can't know yet. I haven't generated the glade code
yet [1], and it's not clear how easy it is to maintain the uninteresting
glade<->dia data moving code. I'm willing to design a new dialog and
write said code, and let you be the judge about what's easier or harder.
After all, you're familiar with stdprops and I'm not, so you'll be in a
position to judge. I trust that we won't be subject to NIH; the better
approach will carry the day.
FWIW, I think the population of people willing to diddle with Glade and
write some pretty easy code is bigger than those willing to master
stdprops. Not that I think that's the determining factor, but it's not
nothing, either.
I'm a Larry Wall kind of lazy programmer; if there's an easy way to do
this, you can depend on me to find it.
--jkl
[1] I'm having a time getting Glade2 installed, whence the delay. The
GTK2 dependency tree is not a joy to behold.