On Tue, 14 May 2002, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> On 2002-05-14 at 19:27, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 19:27:06 +0100 (BST)
>> From: Andrew Ferrier <andrew.junk@new-destiny.co.uk>
>> Reply-To: dia-list@gnome.org
>> To: dia-list@gnome.org
>> Subject: Re: Dia segfaults with diagram tree
>>
>> I checked and 0.90 RC1 is still generating UML generalizations
>> with a null length string for the name in the resulting XML
>> file, when you start from scratch with a new diagram. This
>> predictably causes it to crash every time when you open the
>> diagram tree window. I guess you probably want to fix this.
>
> Hmm... sloppy thinking on my part. Guess that's OK actually as
> long as the symptom is fixed and that having null names for
> generalizations is also deemed OK.
I don't really think it is. But I'm too lazy to dig through and fix it
right now.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?