[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Pango change, first^Wsecond baby step !



At 21:53 22.06.02 +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
>
>Le Sat, Jun 22, 2002, à 09:04:04PM +0200, Hans Breuer a écrit:
>> There is something wrong with bounding box calculation [1] and
>> we need to find a way to get on the right pango_context. It
>> doesn't matter that much on win32 yet (there currently is only 
>> one), but uncontroled mixing of pangox_context, pango_xft_context,
>> or pango_ft2_context appears as asking for trouble to me.
>
>Indeed. Oh, there is a pango_context_list_families() function ? Wonderful...
>
>I guess (I'll try when you had updated) that this will help a lot my
>problems with selecting the right font...
> 
Have just commited something more which helps selecting fonts. Still no
visible differnce though (Layout not properly updated?)

>I think we can now at this point resume the 'normal' flow of operation -- if
>some details change, like tweaking the parameter lists of the dia_font_*()
>functions, that should not lead to unsolvable CVS conflicts.
>
Can't parse this :-) If we continue to work on it in parallel
some synchronization would be needed, wouldn't it?

	Hans

-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to 
get along without it.                -- Dilbert



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] Mail converted by Mofo Magic and the Flying D

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

GuideSMACK